home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.tdl.com!news
- From: Gary Ingram <garyi@dtbsware.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: 7 Feb 1996 08:39:03 GMT
- Organization: dTb Software
- Message-ID: <4f9of7$sb6@news.tdl.com>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no> <4egdqm$app@shore.shore.net> <4eiogb$cas@hasle.sn.no> <310CFB3E.114B@mail.inett.no> <4etkm5$n3p@newshost.cyberramp.net> <4f63bc$97a@news.service.uci.edu> <4f92nd$1e3i@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tdl-dyn44.tdl.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)
-
- er,
-
- I'm boycotting VB4 and am MAH at u$ for ruining what used to be a good
- product. However, the changes (I would call them enhancements) you
- describe are good ones if:
-
- they are documented so other language developers can use them and, they
- reflect a commitment to the break through VB represented back in 1992.
-
- However, IMHO, the C (++ if you prefer) at usoft are ruining VB because
- they can't stand the heat. If gates had the vision he thinks he has he
- would not let it happen.
-
- Gary
-
-